| 1 | Check the Liquor Ratio | Compare the minimum and normal liquor ratio supported by the machine. The liquor ratio is the amount of process water used per kilogram of fabric. | Conventional overflow systems: approximately 1:12–1:20 Low-liquor soft-flow systems: approximately 1:6–1:10 Air-assisted systems: approximately 1:3–1:6 | A lower liquor ratio can reduce water heating, salt and auxiliary consumption, wastewater volume, and cycle cost, provided the fabric remains fully wetted and moves smoothly. | Can the machine maintain even wetting, circulation, and color penetration at the lowest stated liquor ratio for our actual fabric types? |
| 2 | Compare Water Consumption | Review total water used for filling, rinsing, washing, cooling, cleaning, and automatic tank exchange rather than evaluating only the initial bath. | Typical total process-water ranges: Conventional overflow: 120–200 L/kg Low-liquor soft-flow: 60–110 L/kg Air-assisted systems: 30–70 L/kg | Water savings reduce both freshwater intake and the volume of effluent requiring treatment. Actual consumption depends on the recipe, number of rinses, fabric construction, and machine settings. | Is water usage recorded separately for each process stage, and can rinse-flow rates be controlled automatically? |
| 3 | Evaluate Thermal Energy Efficiency | Compare energy required to heat process water, maintain temperature, run pumps, circulate fabric, and complete cooling and rinsing steps. | Indicative thermal and mechanical energy range per kilogram of fabric: Conventional overflow: 1.5–2.4 kWh/kg Low-liquor soft-flow: 0.9–1.6 kWh/kg Air-assisted systems: 0.7–1.3 kWh/kg | Heating the bath is often the largest energy demand. Lower water volume, effective insulation, heat recovery, and optimized circulation can reduce energy use. | Does the supplier provide measured energy data for a complete cycle, including heating, rinsing, cooling, pumps, and fans? |
| 4 | Assess Chemical Efficiency | Examine chemical dosing accuracy, bath concentration control, automatic dilution, residual-liquor volume, and the ability to reuse or recover process baths. | Typical chemical preparation volume per kilogram of fabric: Conventional overflow: 8–14 L/kg Low-liquor soft-flow: 4–8 L/kg Air-assisted systems: 2–5 L/kg | Lower preparation volume can reduce chemical dilution and residual liquor. It does not automatically reduce the required recipe dosage, which must still meet shade and performance specifications. | Can the system dose chemicals by fabric weight and liquor volume while maintaining stable concentration throughout the cycle? |
| 5 | Protect Fabric Quality | Compare fabric-to-fabric contact, nozzle or overflow pressure, rope tension, circulation speed, temperature uniformity, and control of creasing or abrasion. | Suitable operation should provide: Uniform temperature variation: ideally within approximately ±1–2°C Stable fabric circulation: without stoppage or rope accumulation Low-tension handling: for knits and delicate materials | A machine that saves water but creates crease marks, pilling, shade variation, or tensile damage can increase reprocessing, waste, and total production cost. | Has the machine been tested with our most sensitive fabric, darkest shade, highest load, and most crease-prone construction? |
| 6 | Review Operational Productivity | Compare loading capacity, cycle time, fabric loading ratio, automation level, recipe repeatability, unloading time, and changeover requirements. | Typical wet-processing cycle duration: Conventional overflow: 90–150 minutes Low-liquor soft-flow: 60–120 minutes Air-assisted systems: 45–90 minutes | Shorter cycles can increase daily output, but only when shade matching, washing performance, and fabric quality remain consistent. | What is the verified output per 24-hour period after accounting for loading, heating, processing, rinsing, unloading, cleaning, and recipe changeover? |
| 7 | Calculate Total Operating Cost | Include electricity or steam, water, wastewater treatment, chemicals, labor, maintenance, spare parts, downtime, reprocessing, and expected service life. | A practical comparison should use: Cost per kilogram of approved fabric Water per kilogram Energy per kilogram First-pass approval rate Annual productive operating hours | Purchase price alone does not show economic efficiency. A lower-cost machine may have higher utility consumption, more manual work, or greater quality-related losses. | Can the supplier provide a documented cost model based on our fabric mix, production volume, utility prices, recipe profile, and required quality level? |